Current:Home > InvestFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -CapitalWay
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-14 04:10:01
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Facebook, Instagram to block news stories in California if bill passes
- Reddit CEO Steve Huffman: 'It's time we grow up and behave like an adult company'
- UBS finishes takeover of Credit Suisse in deal meant to stem global financial turmoil
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- The Largest U.S. Grid Operator Puts 1,200 Mostly Solar Projects on Hold for Two Years
- Journalists at Gannett newspapers walk out over deep cuts and low pay
- Hollywood writers still going strong, a month after strike began
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Drugmaker Mallinckrodt may renege on $1.7 billion opioid settlement
Ranking
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- ‘Timber Cities’ Might Help Decarbonize the World
- Mega Millions jackpot rises to $820 million, fifth-largest ever: What you need to know
- Duke Energy Is Leaking a Potent Climate-Warming Gas at More Than Five Times the Rate of Other Utilities
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Nature vs. nurture - what twin studies mean for economics
- Thousands of Reddit communities 'go dark' in protest of new developer fees
- Inside Clean Energy: What’s Hotter than Solar Panels? Solar Windows.
Recommendation
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
The OG of ESGs
CBO says debt ceiling deal would cut deficits by $1.5 trillion over the next decade
What we know about the 5 men who were aboard the wrecked Titan sub
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Duke Energy Is Leaking a Potent Climate-Warming Gas at More Than Five Times the Rate of Other Utilities
‘We’re Losing Our People’
In a Strange Twist, Missing Teen Rudy Farias Was Home With His Mom Amid 8-Year Search